我是深刻感觉国内的工业设计不行。什么无障碍设计、跨时代设计(transgenerational design)在严重缺乏人文精神和人权的地方根本做不到。
什么隐藏式门把手是为了减轻阻力省能源,请问你设计的是专业赛车还是普通人的交通工具?那么小点门把手能省多少?真要省,为啥要做那么大的车,不是SUV就是跨界SUV?不会做传统的“小汽车”(约等于欧标B类C类车)吗?什么你说电池太大了,没法保证性能不变?那你这EV都做啥呢???
继续吐槽EV设计:
华为这次撞车起火还有一大众矢之的,那就是隐藏式门把手。说实在话,EV门把手什么样我还真没注意过,回国时家人来机场接我,坐的是表亲开的比亚迪新车,当时也没注意。我印象中的汽车门把手还是经典的机械设计。
这隐藏式门把手真是坑人。北方下场大雪都能把车把手冻住,逼车主用热水浇。如果是电动弹出式的,一旦事故导致电力系统中断,门把手弹不出来,又是安全隐患。
有B站博主去北京车展,开头就是脑残隐藏式门把手设计,搞得博主自己都反应过来不知道怎么开。这种设计简直就是一场无障碍噩梦:关节炎患者、左撇子、小孩子都很难开。而车里面连扣手都没有,这是难为谁呀?
https://m.bilibili.com/video/BV1HE421j7xA?spm_id_from=333.999.0.0
汽车安全性能是大事。这是每天成千上万人出行都会用到的交通工具,就算你不开车,你也一定会坐到别人开的车,不管是亲戚朋友的车还是出租车。所以几乎所有人都会受影响。
还记得前几年的高田安全气囊丑闻吗?日本的高田公司,曾是世界三大汽车安全气囊制造商之一,因为制造的安全气囊存在严重安全隐患,致多国车主死亡和伤残,近亿个安全气囊被召回,涉及17个品牌的数千万辆汽车,成为汽车工业史上最大规模的召回事件。这家有八十余年历史的跨国企业终因支付巨额赔偿资不抵债,于2017年破产。
此事2013年开始发酵,至今还没解决完。就在年初,丰田宣布召回在美国售出的5万辆汽车,包括2003-2004年的卡罗拉和2004-2005年的RAV4。其警示级别为最高的“切勿驾驶”(Do not drive),也就是要售后人员上门维修或者免费把车拖到维修厂去。
有人肯定要问了,2003年出厂的车现在已经21年了,还有人在开吗?别说,如果是卡罗拉还真就有可能。我前些天还在路上看见一辆卡罗拉EX,按生产历史,这车少说也得有11年了。
这个华为是以为自己还在做智能手机吗?能达到汽车工业的安全要求吗?
上过高小和私塾的老年人当年都是什么人的孩子,没有人提。是什么导致他的学业中断,成了“普通农村老人”,也没有说。至于这个家族到底经历过什么历史悲剧,就更不可说了。
“打土豪分田地”到底害了多少人?
所以我对韩国总和生育率(TFR)低到低于1并不稀奇,但也不认为韩国的例子有普适性。
韩国在很多意义上不是个“正常”的国家。这个国家至今处于战时状态,因为朝鲜战争法理上从未结束,而是停战七十余年。即使经济奇迹和民主化也无法掩盖这一事实。诸如韩国财阀不可撼动的垄断地位都是战时体制的一部分。想完全放弃朝鲜半岛统一也不可能,因为北边总想把你给统了,所以韩国一直坐在火药桶上。加上被殖民时贫穷的创伤在社会文化中犹存,如此不稳定因素之下,谁还想生孩子?
@notjustbikes Hello Jason! I watched your video about SUVs and it answered so many questions I frequently encountered on the road as a pedestrian.
This SUV hype is really everywhere. Here in China, 42% of new cars are SUVs, which explains why cars on the road are becoming bigger and bigger. Plug-in electric SUVs and BEV crossover SUVs are already a thing here. In fact, the clip you used in your SUV video at 17:51 is the demonstration by Chinese automaker Great Wall Motors at the 2019 Frankfurt International Motor Show, where the company is showing their premium EV and PHEV brand Wey. Guess what kinds of cars do Wey specialise in? SUVs and crossover SUVs!
This seems totally unreasonable from the surface: why are EV companies jumping into the SUV bandwagon as well? How can EV and PHEV designers ignore basic physics? This is at least partially due to the current shortcomings of EV technologies: lithium ion and polymer batteries for EVs are still too large for practical ranges. Size is the problem. This means automakers who choose to get rid of petrol-only and non-plug-in HEVs right now or never produced them in the first place, such as Tesla and BYD, can use battery size as an excuse to make larger cars. That is why a Tesla Model 3 is much heavier than a Toyota Yaris (or maybe a Corolla, adjusted for vehicle class). This also answered my question of why EVs in China all look weird in some way: it is possibly becasue of all these spaces the batteries have taken.
This problem has serious implications because it means EVs are still less efficient than their promises claimed. They are still not one-to-one replacements for petrol cars, even with more charging stations. Unless there are new breakthroughs in EV technologies, this SUV trend probably will continue. But even if there will be smaller batteries for better ranges, the mindset must change. We probably don't need so many cars, and not everyone need to learn driving for daily life or finding a non-driver job.
Closeted Chinese dissident in self-exile. Still have no idea where I belong to. Cis;💜🤍💚 is for ally with genderqueer people. TERFs go away! She/her